Archive for the ‘Real Estate’ Category

Filed Under (Real Estate, Mortgage) by jeff on June-27-2007

Delinquencies jump among riskiest loans; California, Nevada hit hard

As the U.S. housing market continues to slog through a hangover from its post-millennium boom, mortgage foreclosure data released Thursday provide fresh evidence that the slow-motion unwinding of the easy-money mania is still under way. The number of residential mortgages going into foreclosure hit a record in the first quarter of the year, with the biggest increases coming in the so-called “subprime” market of borrowers with weaker credit histories. Foreclosure rates were highest in a handful of states where home prices and sales surged during the boom, including California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona.

The rate of delinquencies, defined as borrowers who are at least 30 days behind on their payments, also rose among subprime borrowers to 15.75 percent. For all mortgages, the delinquency rate dipped a bit compared with last year’s fourth quarter, but remained higher than the comparable year-ago period. The housing industry watches these numbers closely because the delinquency rate is a bellwether for more serious problems down the road, including a default by borrowers who have gotten in over their heads. Unless those borrowers can renegotiate a new loan with more favorable terms, those defaults will likely become foreclosures. While the dip in delinquencies is a positive sign, it’s too soon to say the rate has peaked, said Doug Duncan, chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “We’re not ready to say one data point is a trend,” he said. “We will probably see modest increases in delinquencies and foreclosures for the next couple of quarters.”A separate report this week by RealtyTrac reported that foreclosures for May were up 19 percent from April and up nearly 90 percent from May 2006. In

Nevada, there was one foreclosure filing for every 166 households last month, nearly four times the national average and the highest rate in the country for the fifth month in a row, according to RealtyTrac.

Some lenders are working to help borrowers who got into trouble. By making concessions, like offering a new loan with a lower interest rate or shifting from an adjustable to a fixed rate, those lenders may lose a little in the short term. But they’re hoping to head off bigger losses if the loan goes to default and the borrower’s home is sold in a foreclosure. “There’s no question that within the industry it’s kind of all hands on deck — let’s work with borrowers,” said

Duncan. “They are aggressively restructuring loans for people who, largely due to circumstances beyond their control, are in some difficulty.”

Those circumstances include a drop in housing prices in many parts of the country, which has left some recent homebuyers holding loans that are bigger than the value of their houses. So far, the biggest problems are cropping up in the relatively small subprime market, where the riskiest lending took place.No one can say for sure when the housing market will hit bottom. The outlook for an overall recovery depends on a variety of factors, including the overall strength of the economy and job market, the direction of future interest moves, and how well borrowers now facing delinquency can get back on their feet.In any case, it will be some time before the dust settles on the mortgage market and any housing turnaround can be confirmed. That’s because the process of working out a delinquent loan — whether through refinancing or foreclosure — can take months to play out. For lenders and investors who bought bad loans, the process will likely extend well into next year.“It can take 12 to 14 months for the loans to go through the foreclosure process and then be sold before a loss might be incurred (by the lender),” said Susan Barnes, head of mortgage-backed securities ratings at Standard & Poor’s.In the meantime, hopes for a buoyant spring season have come and gone for the real estate market with little sign of recovery, especially in regions where the level of unsold new and existing homes remains at historically high levels. “There are large inventories that will have to be worked off in certain sections of the country before we see a recovery take place,” said

Duncan.Meanwhile, lenders have tightened standards for new loans, which has shut some potential buyers out of the market. Rising interest rates have also slowed demand. “Certainly the evidence suggests that the housing recession is getting worse, not better,” said Nouriel Roubini, a former White House economist who is now an economics professor at

New York

University.
While the number of foreclosures hit a record, the national average masks strength and weakness in different regions of the country. Markets in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona, which  saw the biggest boom, are now feeling the most pain — and will likely take the longest to recover. Ohio, Indiana and

Michigan also saw high rates of foreclosures, according to the latest figures. But nearly half the states outside those trouble spots saw a drop in new foreclosures.

So far, it doesn’t appear that the housing recession has spread to the wider

U.S. economy. Though interest rates have bumped higher, they still remain fairly tame by historical standards. Inflation, as measured the by the Producer Price Index, appears to be holding steady, according to figures released Thursday. And despite the pinch of higher gasoline prices, consumer spending has shown little sign of slowing, based on retail sales figures released on Wednesday.

All of which leads some economists to believe that despite the financial hit to the millions of individual borrowers who got in over their heads, the impact on the wider U.S. economy will be limited.

“The U.S. is a massive economy with incredible productivity, and the non-housing (gross domestic product) has been growing over 3 percent in the last year,” said Brian Wesbury, chief economist at First Trust Advisors.

“We can absorb these losses. It’s going to be painful, and there’s still some losses to come. But it’s not the kind of thing that will drag the entire economy down.”

By John W. Schoen
Senior Producer
MSNBC



Filed Under (Real Estate) by jeff on June-27-2007

 

Home prices fall for a record tenth-straight month

 

Sales of existing homes fell for a third straight month in May, dropping to the lowest level in four years as the median sales price declined for a record 10th consecutive month.In a troubling sign for the future, the inventory of unsold homes shot up to the highest level in 15 years, meaning more downward pressure on prices in the months ahead until the inventory glut is reduced.Sales fell by 0.3 percent in May to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.99 million units, the National Association of Realtors reported Monday. Sales now stand 10.3 percent below where they were a year ago.The median price of an existing home sold last month fell to $223,700, down 2.1 percent from a year ago. It marked the 10th straight price decline compared with a year ago, the longest stretch on record.After rising more than 100 points earlier in the day, the Dow Jones industrial average lost those gains to finish down 8.21 points at 13,352.05.The drop in home sales was in line with expectations, providing relief on Wall Street where analysts had been braced for an even worse showing.Economists predicted home prices would likely head lower in the months ahead because of continued troubles in reducing the stockpile of unsold homes, which rose 5 percent in May to 4.43 million units. That was an 8.9 months supply at the May sales pace, a level that has not been seen since July 1992, the last time the country went through a serious housing slump.“The only way we are going to chip away at this Mount Everest-sized pile of inventory is by price cuts and so far, sellers haven’t been aggressive enough,” said Mike Larson, a real estate analyst at Weiss Research. “Don’t look for a lasting bottom in the housing market anytime soon.”The sales decline was led by a 3.4 percent drop in the South. Sales also fell in the West, dropping 0.8 percent. Sales rose by 5.8 percent in the Northeast and 0.7 percent in the

Midwest.Economists predicted further sales declines in coming months as housing is affected by recent troubles in subprime mortgages, which have caused banks and other lenders to raise their qualification standards, making it harder for potential buyers to obtain financing. Rising mortgage defaults also mean more homes dumped on a glutted market.Some analysts said they believed the once high-flying housing market was going through a crisis of confidence. Sales of both new and existing homes set records for five-straight years, prompting what many believe was a speculative bubble in some parts of the country as investors rushed in to buy properties in hopes of a quick resale to take advantage of home prices that were climbing at double-digit rates.Lawrence Yun, senior economist for the Realtors, noted that household formation had slowed. He said that implied many people had decided to put off buying a home and were doubling-up in rental units or moving back home with parents.“It appears some buyers are simply waiting for more signs of stability before they get serious about getting into the market,” he said. “The lack of buyers’ confidence is a major factor in the lower sales.”He said activity in the existing home sales market, which accounts for about 86 percent of annual sales, would continue to suffer until builders were more successful in trimming their production levels for new homes, which make up the other 14 percent of annual home sales.The National Association of Home Builders reported earlier this month that builder sentiment dropped in June to the lowest reading since February 1991, reflecting the spreading troubles with subprime mortgages, which go to borrowers with weak credit histories.Trimming their forecasts, the Realtors now expect existing home sales will fall by 4.6 percent this year, down from a previous forecast of a 2.9 percent drop. They expect the median price of a home to fall by 1.3 percent this year, which would be the first annual price decline on record.Adding to the problems in housing, mortgage rates have recently begun to rise, although they remain well below their historic averages. According to Freddie Mac, the average commitment rate for 30-year mortgages was 6.26 percent in May, up from 6.18 percent in April.



Filed Under (Real Estate) by jeff on June-18-2007

Prices have hit bottom in some cities and are heading back up, but recovery rates vary. Here are the places with the best prospects. 

When it comes to real estate, the questions on everyone’s lips are: How low is low, and when’s the perfect time to buy back in? That moment has passed in Seattle and in

Charlotte, N.C. Both metro areas hit bottom in the first quarter of 2006 and have since posted price gains of 12.3% and 6.3%, respectively, according to National Association of Realtors (NAR) data. Ripe for investment? Philadelphia and

New Orleans
. Based on housing inventory and local economic conditions, both should hit price troughs by year’s end and bounce back with moderate gains of around 4% in 2008.
In markets expected to recover more slowly, such as Boston and

Denver
, low buyer confidence coupled with a surplus of housing stock has lengthened the slump. NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun points out that buyers are looking for clear signs of a market bottom and are content to wait on the sidelines until then.
It’s easy to see why. Most of the country’s real-estate markets are feeling the effects of overproduction. A strong market hovers near a 1.5% vacancy rate, but the national average currently stands at 2.8%, and in cities such as Miami, Atlanta and

Denver
, figures hang around 3.5%. In addition, every nugget of good news (like the May Commerce Department report that said new-home sales are at a 14-year high) comes with bad news (median price growth is at a 10-year low).

More on MSN and Forbes.com

So which other metro area markets stand the best chance of recovery, and when will that upturn occur? Behind the numbers Market corrections follow three basic recovery patterns: a V-shaped recovery where a market experiences a sharp, fast decline but comes out strong once it hits bottom; a U-shaped recovery, where prices decline gradually and recover slowly; and an L-shaped pattern, a hard, fast fall with a paltry price bounce-back after the market trough.The differences between a V-shaped market and a U-shaped one have to do with barriers to growth. High vacancy rates and high investor share can hurt a market, but if the local economy remains strong and housing stock affordable, it’s only a matter of how long it takes to absorb the excess inventory. Tampa, Fla., is a perfect candidate for a V-shaped recovery, according to research from Moody’s Economy.com, an economic analysis, forecasting and credit risk firm in

West Chester, Pa. The local economy remains strong, and subprime lending is relatively low.

Tampa
’s problem? A high investor share that led to high vacancy rates. When the market turned sour in 2005, more than 25% of

Tampa
homes were owned as investment properties. Investors are quicker to flee during a downturn, thus creating a glut of available housing stock. In

Tampa
’s case, vacancy rates now stand at 3.5%. “As investors exit, the market revives,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, as fewer speculative buyers result in a more stable market. “

Tampa
’s a pretty affordable market, and first-time buyers can come in once prices fall.”
Based on Moody’s Economy projections,

Tampa
should burn off its excess inventory and hit a price trough in the first quarter of 2008, at which point prices are expected to increase by 10.6% the following year.
These projections take into account housing affordability, vacancy rates, the strength of the local economy and job market, investor share in 2005 and the share of subprime mortgages. Data are from Moody’s, the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Federal Reserve. Predicting the bottom of any asset market, especially real estate, is a difficult thing. While these projections are based on sound data and advanced modeling by Moody’s, no one can predict futures markets with absolute certainty.Other bounces Like Tampa,

Phoenix
is afflicted by high investor share (26.1%), and it has a vacancy rate of more than 3%. Good affordability rates and a surging job market suggest that once

Phoenix
bottoms out, price growth will be strong. Moody’s projection model has

Phoenix
reaching its price trough in the fourth quarter of 2008 and then growing by 7.7% the following year.
Slower recovery rates are expected in markets such as Minneapolis and

Boston
, where a slumping local economy, slow job growth and negative migration numbers hamper long-term prospects. Along with other U-shaped markets, like Sacramento, that have double-digit subprime lending share, Zandi says it’s going to be harder for these markets to get going again.
That doesn’t necessarily mean V-shaped markets are in the clear. The labor markets in cities such as Las Vegas, Phoenix and

San Diego
, whose future economic success will be critical to recovery, are heavily in housing-related industries, according to Moody’s. So long as those economies can weather their respective corrections, they should be all right.
“These markets are going to experience more substantial declines in the coming year,” says Zandi. “Gauging the bottom is a very intrepid affair, and the job market is very important to recovery.” Real-estate markets with the best prospects for recovery

Rank Market Expected market bottom Est. price appreciation after bottom
1 Tampa, Fla. Q1 2008 10.60%
2 Phoenix Q4 2008 7.70%
3 Las Vegas Q2 2009 7.20%
4 San Diego Q2 2008 5.30%
5 New Orleans Q3 2007 4.30%

 

By Matt Woolsey, Forbes.com



Filed Under (Technology, Real Estate) by jeff on June-18-2007

Yes, if you know how — literally — to play the game. But, as in real life, only a few are really good at it.

 

Perhaps you’ve heard of the land baroness named Anshe Chung. No? Maybe that’s because Chung only exists in the virtual reality game Second Life. Chung, or rather, her real-life counterpart, Ailin Graef, has gained attention — and a BusinessWeek cover — as the first person to reportedly become a real-world millionaire from her virtual-world business.

How’d she do it? By buying, developing and selling virtual real estate. While much of her wealth is still tied up in Second Life’s currency,

Linden dollars, those can be sold for genuine U.S. dollars. Graef reportedly makes upward of $150,000 annually.

Second Life is one of several massively multiplayer online role-playing games that are, literally, their own worlds. Julian Dibbell, author of “Play Money: Or How I Quit My Day Job and Made Millions Trading Virtual Loot,” estimates the market for virtual items across games such as Second Life and Ultima Online has hit the $1 billion mark. “I think it’s safe to say that it’s at least $1 billion now,” he says. 

Such numbers — along with success stories like Graef’s — show there’s real scratch to be made from online dirt. But just how much depends on a number of factors, of which only a handful are under your control. Here’s how the virtual real estate game is played.

A Second Life land primer

In Second Life, users customize digital alter-egos called “avatars” that can walk down streets, gamble in casinos, do distance learning for university degrees, cavort in strip clubs, fly over Second Life’s varied landscapes, you name it. And when users want a place to roost, people often buy or rent virtual property.

In early May, 5,400 residents were selling 30,500 parcels. “Real-estate speculation offers such attractive opportunities that almost everyone dabbles in it, and many Second Life people make it a permanent side occupation that delivers a steady stream of profits,” writes Catherine Winters in her new book, “Second Life: The Official Guide.”

There are a few ways to acquire land in Second Life:

  • You can buy land from another resident.
  • You can buy land at an auction, using real or Linden dollars (the exchange rate hovers at about 270 to 1 U.S. dollar).
  • Or, if you want a big spread, either for yourself or to divide and later resell as smaller parcels, you can buy a customizable, 16-acre island of land known as a “sim” from Linden Lab, Second Life’s creator. A sim costs $1,675 U.S., plus a $295 monthly fee, called a “tier.” (Linden Lab makes most of its money off such land sales.)

Bane Darrow, who, like several people in Second Life, asked that his real name not be used, falls into this last group of buyers. Darrow co-owns and operates Darrow Estates, which offers residentially zoned properties in Second Life with community covenants.

“I started it about three or four months ago” as a part-time hobby, says Darrow, who is a Seattle-area computer programmer.

Darrow and his partner buy sims from Linden Lab, choose some basic topography and then customize the new land before dividing it into 16 parcels for resale.

“We spend a week or two just getting the sim ready — adjusting the land heights where we want them, putting in trees; we have a lake in both of our sims, streams, waterfalls, rocks, particle effects that kind of looks like splashing.”

The parcels are advertised on Darrow’s Web site, where people can buy a parcel and pay for it with PayPal. Darrow Estates even advertises on Google.

The bottom line

If you want to buy a 4,096-square-meter parcel in Darrow Estates’ first development, “Blueberry,” a lush region with a lake and waterfall, it costs $20 to set up, and $26 per month ever after. “We are sitting at 90% to 95% capacity,” Darrow says, not unproudly.

At that occupancy rate, he’s bringing in about $390 per month from the monthly fees on each sim; the initial $20 fee per parcel adds a one-time bump of about $300 per sim, which Darrow says helps pay for his Google ads. He sees the $1,675 as a capital investment since he can resell the entire sim. But it’s clear this is not a huge moneymaker for Darrow. The monthly fees from his buyers leave him just about $95 per month, meaning it takes at least 17 months to recoup the initial $1,675 investment. Even ignoring advertising costs and including the initial $20 fees, it would still take a good 14 months before he would be in the black.

Home Affordability Calculator

Yearly gross income

$

$

$

The number of users making smallish amounts — just $10 to $50 monthly — with a Second Life virtual business was about 9,500 in April, or nearly triple that of November. “There’s a lot of people with a self-sustaining hobby that generates drinks money on the side,” says Adam Frisby, a 22-year-old computer science student and entrepreneur from Perth, Australia, who’s co-founder of Second Life’s

Azure Islands. Meanwhile, the number of “in-world” business owners who are making more than $5,000 per month was only 139 as of April, estimates Linden Lab. Though that’s up from an estimated 58 in November, it’s still a tiny fraction of the more than 7 million users. No one can say for sure how many of those are in virtual real estate. But several Second Life pros agree that big-time real-estate players number maybe a half dozen.

Hitting online pay dirt

Those who are doing well in Second Life real estate aren’t just selling land; they’ve figured out how to provide some value or a service that users want to buy into, says author Winters. “It’s all about coming up with a reason to be in this community versus that community,” Winters says.

Alliez Mysterio (again, her Second Life name), seems to have excelled at this. Mysterio, a woman in the Lake George area of

New York, runs dAlliez Private Estates with a partner. With 53 estates, each a sim in size, and well over 200 renters, dAlliez is one of the largest real-estate developers in Second Life.

“We have a few themed estates and also just plain land for the people to use,” Mysterio says. One of the themed estates is “the Rue d’Alliez,” a French marketplace-type milieu complete with a cabaret.

With people often renting one-quarter sim from dAlliez and paying $75 to $100 each, Mysterio and her partner likely bring in somewhere north of $17,000 a month. “We have reinvested our money in setting up more estates from Linden Lab. So (we) actually don’t take out much money yet,” she says, though she acknowledges she makes enough in Second Life that she doesn’t have to leave her home to work elsewhere.

“There is money to be made if people are not greedy,” Mysterio adds. “I have seen too many people come in, buy estates and not have one up and paying for itself before they buy another. This is a way of life, and as such, I put my customers first and they know that.”

How virtual land is — and isn’t — like real-world real estate

Whether you have your sights set on Second Life as a source of fun or profit — or both — there are some basic things to keep in mind about how the virtual real-estate world differs from real real estate.

Realtors undercutting FSBOs. There’s not such an obvious role for real-estate agents in Second Life, users say, in large part because the users have free access to all the search tools. Yet that hasn’t stopped real world real-estate behemoth Coldwell Banker from getting into the act — part of a larger influx of real companies into the virtual world. In March, the company put up for sale more than 500 homes in Second Life, at about $20 each including the land — and they’ll toss in home furnishings as a closing gift. “My understanding — and it’s just my understanding — is the average land baron would sell the average plot of land for $60US,” says Charlie Young, senior vice president for marketing.

Coldwell Banker also opened a virtual real-estate office that’s staffed with a few agents. This isn’t a way for Coldwell Banker to cash in on virtual real estate, says Young, but to find new ways to reach some of the estimated 80 million Echo Boomers and make them familiar with the Coldwell Banker brand. If more real-world brokers begin using Second Life to extend their brand, this could bring added pressure on Second Life land prices.

No housing bubble. In contrast to real-world real estate, prices in Second Life have been relatively stable for the past nine months or so, a long time in Second Life’s short life span, says a Linden Lab spokesman. But when price jumps come, they are more abrupt and, at least with sims, are generally at the whim of Linden Lab. Linden increased the price for a sim several months ago from $1,600 to $1,675 — almost 5% — and the monthly tier for new purchasers rose a much steeper 51%, from $195 per month to $295 per month. 

Land is virtually in endless supply: As Second Life’s popularity increases (today, it has 7.2 million registered users), Linden Lab simply grows the land size of its virtual world. Were it laid out in real life, Second Life would cover nearly 600 square kilometers — a tripling in the past six months. That’s nearly seven times the size of

Manhattan.

The eternal mortgage. In Second Life, you never actually own a piece of land, free and clear. Though you may pay an initial fee to gain control of a piece of land, you forever have to pay that monthly bill. As one virtual landowner put it, “You never don’t pay rent.”

Eviction? Yup, it’s here, too. What happens if you stop paying that monthly fee — either to Linden Lab, or to a landowner that you’ve “bought” a plot from? You could be barred from accessing your land until you do pay — or have your land taken from you entirely. (Interestingly, A Pennsylvania man recently brought a real-world lawsuit against

Linden when his Second Life land holdings were confiscated. Read more here.) 

Virtual lending. As yet, there don’t seem to be virtual banks in Second Life to fund real-estate purchases, so you’ll need all the money up front (or enough credit available on your real-world credit card).

You can’t escape real-world taxes. Real-world money made in the virtual world is taxable. And now the U.S. government is even mulling whether online money made, and kept, in online currency like

Linden dollars is also taxable. A

U.S.
congressional committee is starting to look at the issue.

The future may be bright — but it’s also hazy

Finally, you need to ask yourself: Is it wise for you to sink a lot of time and money into a relatively untested virtual world, where the odds of making a mint aren’t with you? And then there’s the other big question: What if Second Life’s popularity wanes? Many with dreams of becoming that next Anshe Chung could come away empty-handed.

Players like Darrow don’t seem particularly worried. He says there are other, nonmonetary reasons to invest in online real estate. “It’s kind of like the game within the game,” he says. “I’m running a business. That’s how I play the game.”

That mirrors author Winters’ advice to prospective players. It’s better to come to Second Life to socialize and create, rather than expecting to make a fortune, she says. You’ll enjoy yourself much more. “Most people are going there not to make money,” she says. “Virtually nobody.”

5 tips for real success in virtual real estate

  • People come to virtual reality to explore possibilities. Ask yourself, “What can I offer that’s unique, that Second Life users couldn’t build or haven’t dreamed up themselves?” Winters advises.
  • Make your first sim stand on its own and pay for itself before you buy another, Darrow advises.
  • Some things never change: Customer service must be No. 1, Mysterio says.
  • As with gambling, don’t invest more than you can afford to lose, Frisby cautions.
  • It’s easy to be just a blip in the ever-growing Second Life world. Market yourself, in both worlds, by advertising online in the real world, and with a listing on Second Life, when people search for “land.”

By Christopher Solomon 



Filed Under (Real Estate) by jeff on June-15-2007

Some of the nation’s most overheated housing markets may be cooling off to more reasonable levels following their unprecedented run-up in the first half of the decade. According to a report from the financial service companies, National City Corp and Global Insight, the number of single-family homes they judged overvalued in the

United States fell from 17 percent in the last quarter of 2006 to 14 percent in the quarter ended March 31. Of the 317 metro areas covered by the survey, 157 of them, experienced price declines during the quarter. That - combined with wage gains and steady interest rates - reduced widespread overvaluation of homes. The report’s authors determined proper home values based on population density, relative income levels, interest rates and historically observed market premiums or discounts. They compared them to actual selling prices to arrive at overvaluations or undervaluations. The figures are important to investors and home buyers because highly overvalued markets are the ones most in danger of future price declines. The latest price declines were mostly clustered in areas that had seen big price run-ups during the boom, with California, Florida, New York and

Massachusetts taking hits.
James Diffley, managing director of Global Insight’s Regional Services Group, said in a statement, “The price declines we are seeing today in California, Florida, and New England were predicted two years ago when we identified them as the most extremely overvalued markets in the nation.” Most overvalued areas are on the coasts while the heartland tends to have more fairly valued, even undervalued properties. But economic problems in manufacturing states like Michigan and

Ohio caused price drops in those states as well.
The report identified

Bend, Oregon as the most overvalued metro area in the nation. The median single-family house price there is more than $324,000, almost twice what it sold for four years earlier and 78.7 percent over the survey’s valuation price.
Bend took over first place from

Naples, Florida, which had led the pack for several years. Price declines in

Naples enabled it to slip into third place at 63.4 percent overvalued. In second place was

Prescott, Arizona, at 64.6 percent.
The most undervalued market, according to the survey, is

Dallas, where homes sell for 24.9 percent below their proper price.

Texas boasts the four most undervalued metro markets in the report.
The metro areas facing the greatest threat of future price drops are in

California, according to Diffley.
He blamed it on a, “huge glut of new and existing homes for sale on the market, and the tightening of credit standards in light of the subprime mortgage troubles [that] will continue to exert downward pressure on prices for some time.”

By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer



Filed Under (Real Estate) by jeff on June-13-2007

Your mortgage payments are only a fraction of what you’ll pay out after you become a homeowner. The total? For this writer, $43,555 in four years, not counting house payments.

By Cameron Huddleston, Kiplinger.com
If you’re entertaining thoughts of buying your first home now that the housing market is cooling off and prices are coming down, take note: The cost of home ownership might be a lot more than you think.

I’m not talking about the down payment or monthly mortgage payments. Although buying a home is a big investment, owning one comes with a new set of expenses you may not have had while renting or living with Mom and Dad. These extras can put a strain on your daily finances if you aren’t prepared.

I know the temptation to buy a house can be strong, especially if you’ve been renting for a while, have gotten married or are ready to start a family. When my husband, Alex, and I moved to Kentucky four years ago from Washington, D.C., where we rented an apartment for six years, I couldn’t wait to buy a house. Since then, we have sold our first home, bought our dream home (well, at least it will be after we do a lot of work on it) and learned plenty about how much it really costs to be homeowners.

So to help you estimate your own cost of ownership and come up with a realistic housing budget, I offer my experience as an example. Below, I itemize the expenses Alex and I have paid over the past four years, complete with dollar amounts. Your own costs will vary depending on the size, condition and location of the house, but this should help you anticipate what you’re getting into. Homeownership comes with a bevy of benefits, but you’ll want to make sure it’s the right move for you at this point in your life before making that long-term commitment.



Filed Under (Real Estate, Home Inspections) by jeff on June-12-2007

90% leap over last year; figure pushed up by slowing real estate market, subprime meltdown.

 June 12 2007: 3:23 PM EDT


NEW YORK (Reuters) — Home foreclosures in May jumped 90 percent from a year earlier, reflecting a poor spring housing market and foreshadowing even higher levels later in 2007, real estate data firm RealtyTrac said Tuesday.The May foreclosures - a sum of default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions - totaled 176,137, up 19 percent from April, the firm said in its May 2007 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report. “After a barely perceptible dip in April, foreclosure activity roared back with a vengeance in May,” James Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac, said in a statement.“Such strong activity in the midst of the typical spring buying season could foreshadow even higher foreclosure levels later in the year,” said Saccacio. “Certainly not every community nationwide is seeing an increase in foreclosures, but foreclosed properties are becoming more commonplace and adding to the downward pressure on home prices in many areas.”RealtyTrac said there was a national foreclosure rate of one foreclosure filing for every 656 U.S. households during May.


Where the growth is - and isn’t The default rates in the subprime segment of the

U.S. mortgage market, which caters to borrowers with poor credit histories, have jumped in recent months as the housing industry has slowed and prices have fallen.
More than two dozen lenders in the subprime mortgage sector have collapsed as rising defaults drove them out of business during a downturn in the housing market.Market observers are keeping a watchful eye on the subprime crisis because it has triggered broader concerns that the fallout may spread to mainstream lenders and damage the economy.A slowing housing market affects homebuilders, such as Centex (down $0.90 to $44.37, Charts, Fortune 500), Hovnanian Enterprises (down $0.62 to $20.55, Charts, Fortune 500) and Pulte (down $0.67 to $24.72, Charts, Fortune 500), as well as banks that make mortgage loans, such as Bank of America (down $0.19 to $49.86, Charts, Fortune 500) and Wachovia (down $0.39 to $53.21, Charts, Fortune 500).   



Filed Under (Real Estate) by jeff on June-12-2007

Sunday June 10, 2:16 pm ET

By Alex Veiga, AP Business Writer
 
Wannabe Buyers Welcome Housing Market Slump, but Lenders Tighten Mortgage Standards

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Kurt Montufar isn’t stressing over the housing slump. He’s actually hoping things get worse. Like many wannabe homebuyers who were priced out of the market during the last boom, Montufar spends time these days scanning real estate ads and news reports to determine if it’s time to take the plunge and buy.

 Foreclosures rising? Great. Cash-strapped sellers pressured into lowering prices because they can’t find buyers? Even better.

“Somebody else’s misfortune could be my happy ending,” said Montufar, 27, a resident of suburban Los Angeles.

Indeed, the advantage is shifting to buyers in many previously high-flying housing markets, as homes take longer to sell and prices level off or begin to fall.

Modest annual declines have been seen in cities such as San Diego, Boston, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Honolulu, according to first-quarter data on existing single-family homes compiled by the National Association of Realtors.

Meanwhile, price gains of just 1.4 percent or less were reported in New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C.

Those numbers have left many people trying to “time” the market to take advantage of the slump. But experts said that can be risky because there is little consensus on how long the current doldrums might last.

In addition, the market forces that helped drive the housing boom — affordable financing and the alluring prospect of escalating home values — are no longer a given. Potential price breaks could be wiped out if interest rates rise any higher.

“In general, it is very difficult to time the market,” said Raphael Bostic, associate director of the University of Southern California’s Lusk Center for Real Estate.

“The real problem with that is you don’t know when the floor is until after it’s passed. If the floor is right now, you missed it,” he said.

Montufar, an asset manager and part-time real estate agent, has little choice about waiting for prices to fall further.

He would like to pay about $500,000 for a home in the San Fernando Valley. However, the properties he has been eying are still priced at about $650,000.

“At this point, I’ve got no choice but to wait and see … how low they get so that it gets to a point where I can afford it,” he said.

Others have already seized opportunities to buy.

Melanie Scalice, 36, a seventh-grade teacher living in the Boston suburb of Arlington, Mass., saved for years for a home. She decided to jump into the market when local housing prices began to dip after years of double-digit percentage increases.

“The timing has been great,” Scalice said. “With prices going down, there’s so much for sale that I had a lot to choose from.”

Still, she had to go to Fitchburg, some 40 miles from Arlington, to find a home that suited her budget and need for space. She settled on a $199,000 condominium.

Areas outside big markets may still represent the best option for finding an affordable home.

“There are areas where prices will, at worst, stay flat, but probably continue to go up,” said Patrick Lashinsky, CEO and president of Emeryville, Calif.-based ZipRealty Inc.

Home prices haven’t lost much steam in the Northwest. Seattle’s metro area, for example, saw its median price soar 12.3 percent during the first quarter.

In California, where home values more than tripled since 1995, sales have been lagging and price appreciation has slowed or fallen in major metro areas.

Prices have declined sharply in regions that saw major home or condo construction in recent years, such as Riverside, San Bernardino and San Diego counties.

Even if prices fall further, it could be tough for buyers to find affordable financing if interest rates increase much more.

The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate from 1 percent to 5.25 percent between June 2004 and June 2006. The rate, which can affect mortgages, has held steady since then.

Meanwhile, the monthly average interest rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage crept from a low of 5.23 percent in June 2003 to 6.26 percent last month, according to mortgage giant Freddie Mac.

In addition, lenders have tightened standards in response to a surge in defaults by subprime borrowers, and a number of subprime lenders have gone out of business altogether.

A number of wannabe buyers are pinning their hopes on foreclosures, which some studies predict will explode during the next two years as adjustable mortgages reset to higher interest rates.

Foreclosure activity jumped 62 percent nationwide in April from the year-ago period, according to Irvine-based RealtyTrac Inc. Among the states with the highest foreclosure rates were Nevada, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida and California.

Gino Barragan of La Puente, Calif., a lifelong renter, was among the hundreds of people who attended a recent auction looking for a good deal on a foreclosed home.

Barragan, 34, was hoping to find a condo costing less than $300,000. He found only one that he liked within his price range.

“I am willing to wait, but I’m keeping my eyes open,” said Barragan, a teacher.

Bruce Norris, president of The Norris Group, a real estate investment company, said now might be the best time to purchase a home, if the buyer plans to live there for 10 years.

“I’m not sure that I wouldn’t rather pay today’s price with today’s interest rate than count on a big discount and the wild card that interest rates might be very different,” Norris said.

“It would not shock me to have a 10 percent interest rate by the end of this negative cycle,” he said.

AP Business Writer Mark Jewell in Boston contributed to this story.



Filed Under (Real Estate) by jeff on June-11-2007

By Matt Woolsey, Forbes.com
June 11, 2007

When it comes to real estate, the questions on everyone’s lips are: How low is low, and when’s the perfect time to buy back in?

That moment has passed in Seattle and Charlotte–both metros hit bottom in the first quarter of 2006 and have since posted price gains of 12.3% and 6.3%, respectively, according to National Association of Realtors (NAR) data.

Ripe for investment? Philadelphia and New Orleans. Based on housing inventory and local economic conditions, both should hit price troughs by year’s end and bounce back with moderate gains around 4% in 2008.

 In markets expected to recover more slowly, such as Boston and Denver, low buyer confidence coupled with a surplus of housing stock has lengthened the slump. NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun points out that buyers are looking for clear signs of a market bottom and are content to wait on the sidelines until then.

It’s easy to see why. Most of the country’s real estate markets are feeling the effects of overproduction. A strong market hovers near a 1.5% vacancy rate, but the national average currently stands at 2.8% and in cities such as Miami, Atlanta and Denver, figures hang around 3.5%. In addition, every nugget of good news (a May Commerce Department report said that new-home sales are at a 14-year high) comes with bad news (median price growth is at a 10-year low).

So which other metro area markets stand the best chance of recovery, and when will that upturn occur?

Behind The Numbers
Market corrections follow three basic recovery patterns. A V-shaped recovery where a market experiences a sharp, fast decline but comes out strong once it hits bottom; a U-shaped recovery, where prices decline gradually and recover slowly; and an L-shaped curve, a hard, fast fall with paltry price bounceback following the market trough.

The differences between a V-shaped market and a U-shaped one has to do with barriers to growth. High vacancy rates and high investor share can hurt a market, but if the local economy remains strong and housing stock affordable it’s only a matter of how long it takes to absorb the excess inventory.

Tampa is a perfect candidate for a V-shaped recovery, according to research from Moody’s Economy.com, an economic analysis, forecasting and credit risk firm. The local economy remains strong, and subprime lending is relatively low. Tampa’s problem? A high investor share that lead to high vacancy rates. When the market turned sour in 2005, more than 25% of Tampa homes were owned as investment properties. Investors are quicker to flee during a downturn, thus creating a glut of available housing stock. In Tampa’s case, vacancy rates now stand at 3.5%.

“As investors exit, the market revives,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at West Chester, Pa.-based research firm Moody’s Economy.com, as fewer speculative buyers results in a more stable market. “Tampa’s a pretty affordable market and first-time buyers can come in once prices fall.”

In the market for a seven-figure home? How much domain your dollar will net depends on where you look. Based on Moody’s Economy projections, Tampa should burn off its excess inventory and hit a price trough in the first quarter of 2008, at which point prices are expected to increase by 10.6% the following year.

These projections take into account housing affordability, vacancy rates, the strength of the local economy and job market, investor share in 2005 and the share of subprime mortgages. Data comes from Moody’s, the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Federal Reserve’s Home Mortgage Disclosure Act.

Predicting the bottom of any asset market, especially real estate, is a difficult thing. While these projections are based on sound data and advanced modeling by Moody’s, no one can predict futures markets with absolute certainty.

Other Bounce Backs
Like Tampa, Phoenix is similarly afflicted by high investor share (26.1%) and it has a vacancy rate over 3%. Good affordability rates and a surging job market suggest that once Phoenix bottoms out, price growth will be strong. Moody’s projection model has Phoenix reaching its price trough in the fourth quarter of 2008 and then growing by 7.7% the following year.

Slower recovery rates are expected in markets such as Minneapolis and Boston, where a slumping local economy, slow job growth and negative migration numbers hamper long term prospects. Along with other U-shaped markets like Sacramento, that have double-digit subprime lending share, Zandi says it’s going to be harder for these markets to get going again.

That doesn’t necessarily mean V-shaped markets are in the clear. The labor markets in cities such as Las Vegas, Phoenix and San Diego, whose future economic success will be critical to recovery, are heavily in housing-related industries, according to Moody’s. So long as those economies can weather their respective corrections, they should be all right.

“These markets are going to experience more substantial declines in the coming year,” says Zandi. “Gauging the bottom is a very intrepid affair and the job market is very important to recovery.”



Next Entries »